Warum? Eine Geschichte des Holocaust.
by author: Peter HayesTD: volume 15, issue 2018, 1, page 143–145
TD: volume 15, issue 2018, 1, page 143–145
TD: volume 13, issue 2016, 1, page 3–6
TD: volume 13, issue 2016, 1, page 7–8
TD: volume 12, issue 2015, 1, page 119–139
Es folgt die Zusammenfassung in englischer Sprache following the article short description
Ideocracies have to look to the people who have the ability to think and act independently within the limits prescribed by the ideology of the system. For this reason, ideocratic regimes cannot aim at completely destroying human autonomy. Indoctrination should thus aspire to generate dispositions to development of convictions that are compliant with the ideology. Ideocracies rely on people who are proactive and capable of thinking for themselves – however, always within the strict limits of the irrevocable essence of the system ideology and without ever questioning the established ideological core. In this inner contradiction of the ideological project are the seeds of its self-destruction.
TD: volume 12, issue 2015, 1, page 143–144
TD: volume 12, issue 2015, 1, page 143–144
TD: volume 12, issue 2015, 1, page 143–144
TD: volume 12, issue 2015, 2, page 346–349
TD: volume 11, issue 2014, 2, page 311–312
TD: volume 10, issue 2013, 1, page 135–163
Es folgt die Zusammenfassung in englischer Sprache following the article short description
Ideological dictatorships not only base their legitimacy on the agreement of those being subject to their rule, also their long-term stability depends on sufficient numbers agreeing with their rule. Agreement may be expected most of all if the members of the respective community have internalised the system’s ideology. The process of shaping the consciousness, which results in internalising the system’s ideology without the individual having rational reasons for developing the respective conviction, is called “indoctrination”. The contribution analyses the means of indoctrination as the crucial and indispensable technology of the rule of ideology-guided dictatorships.
TD: volume 6, issue 2009, 1, page 117–119
TD: volume 5, issue 2008, 2, page 149–153
TD: volume 5, issue 2008, 2, page 155–159
TD: volume 5, issue 2008, 2, page 205–227
Es folgt die Zusammenfassung in englischer Sprache following the article short description
TD: volume 5, issue 2008, 2, page 424–426
TD: volume 4, issue 2007, 2, page 403–405
TD: volume 3, issue 2006, 1, page 175–177
TD: volume 2, issue 2005, 1, page 101–152
Trotz ihrer inhaltlichen Unterschiede waren die kommunistische wie die nationalsozialistische Weltanschauung als Herrschaftsideologien totalitärer Diktaturen tauglich. Sie erwiesen sich insbesondere als geeignet, ein opferträchtiges politisches Handeln (scheinbar) zu legitimieren. Ohne die Falschheit und Fragwürdigkeit der Ideensysteme nachzuweisen, wird das Rechtfertigungspotential aufgezeigt, das ihnen innewohnt. Es zeigt sich, dass beide Ideensysteme hinsichtlich ihres Aufbaus und ihrer Konstruktionselemente sowie hinsichtlich maßgebender Denkfiguren erhebliche Ähnlichkeiten aufweisen.
Es folgt die Zusammenfassung in englischer Sprache following the article short description
Despite their differences in content, the Communist and National Socialist Weltanschauungen were suitable for serving as the ruling ideologies for totalitarian dictatorships. They proved to be especially appropriate for legitimating a political behavior, which claimed many victims. Without showing the falsehood and dubious nature of these systems of ideas, their inherent potential for justification is highlighted. It shows, that both systems of ideas hold considerable similarities concerning their structure and elements, as well as in their basic concepts.
TD: volume 2, issue 2005, 2, page 419–420
TD: volume 1, issue 2004, 2, page 227–264
Nach Reflexionen über Forschungsauftrag und Forschungsgegenstand des HAIT werden forschungsstrategische und methodologische Überlegungen zur Totalitarismusforschung vorgelegt. In seinem, zunächst für die institutsinterne Diskussion verfassten Papier spricht sich der Autor für eine Totalitarismusforschung aus, die an praktisch-politischen Fragestellungen orientiert ist. In diesem Zusammenhang plädiert er für eine Totalitarismusvermeidungsforschung, die insbesondere auch totalitäre Gefährdungen des demokratischen Verfassungsstaates reflektiert. Es zeigt sich, dass das dargelegte Verständnis von Totalitarismusforschung Interdisziplinarität erfordert.
Es folgt die Zusammenfassung in englischer Sprache following the article short description
In his article, originally intended for internal discussion, the author speaks out in favor of research on totalitarianism, which is orientated toward practical political questions. He pleads for research on how to avoid totalitarianism, which involves reflections on totalitarian dangers to the democratic constitutional state. The expounded understanding of research on totalitarianism requires interdisciplinary exchange to attain its maximum potential.
TD: volume 1, issue 2004, 2, page 288–290